6.3
Producing Reports
On a regular basis, a successful
stream volunteer monitoring
program should produce
reports that summarize key
findings to volunteers; data
users such as state water quality
agencies, and local planning
boards; and/or the general
public, including the media.
State water quality agencies will
require detailed reports,
whereas shorter and less
technical summaries are more
appropriate for the general
public. All reports should be
subjected to the review process
prescribed by your Quality
Assurance Project Plan.
Professional Report
In a report designed for water
quality or planning
professionals, you should go
into detail about:
- The purpose of the study
- Who conducted it
- How it was funded
- The methods used
- The quality control measures
taken
- Your interpretation of the
results
- Your conclusions and
recommendations
- Further questions that have
arisen as a result of the study.
Graphics, tables and maps may
be fairly sophisticated. Be sure
to include the raw data in an
appendix and note any
problems encountered.
Lay Report
A report for the general public
should be short and direct. It is
very important to write in a
nontechnical style and to include
definitions for terms and
concepts that may be unfamiliar
to the lay person. Simple charts, summary tables, and
maps with accompanying
explanations can be especially
useful. This type of report
should include a brief
description of the program, the
purpose of the monitoring, an
explanation of the parameters
that were monitored, the
location of sample sites, a
summary of the results, and any
recommendations that may have
been made.
Both types of reports should acknowledge the volunteers and the sources of funding.
Publicizing the Report
Develop a strategy for distributing and publicizing your
report before it is completed.
Be sure the planning committee
is confident about the data and
comfortable with the statements
and conclusions that have been
included in the document. When
the report is released to the
public, you will need to be
prepared to respond to
questions regarding the data and
your interpretation of that data.
Some ideas for distributing the results and informing the public include the following:
- Mailing the report. If you have access to a mailing list of
people who are interested in
your stream, mail the report
with a cover letter that
summarizes the major findings
of the study. The cover letter
should be brief and enticing so
that the recipient will be curious
enough to read the report. If
you want people to take some
kind of action, such as
supporting the expenditure of
public funds to upgrade a
sewage treatment plant, you
may want to ask for their
support in the cover letter. If
you do not have an extensive
mailing list, perhaps other
organizations that share your
goals would be willing to supply
you with their list. Be sure to
also send the report to the
newspapers, radio and
television stations, and state and
federal agencies.
- Speaking tour. You may also
want to develop an oral
presentation (with slides,
overheads, etc.) that could be
offered to groups such as the
Chamber of Commerce, Rotary
clubs, conservation
organizations, schools, and
government entities. Your
presentation could even be
videotaped for distribution to a
wider audience.
- Public meetings. You may
want to schedule a series of
public meetings that highlight the
program and its findings and
recommendations. At the
meetings, distribute the report,
answer questions and tell your
audience how they can get
involved. These meetings can
also help you recruit more
volunteers.
Be sure to schedule the
meetings at times when people
are more likely to attend (i.e.,
weekday evenings, weekend
days) and avoid periods when
people are normally busy or on
vacation. Invite the media and
publicize the meetings in
newspaper calendars, send
press releases to newspapers,
radio and television stations and
other organizations, and ask
volunteers to distribute flyers at
grocery stores, city hall, etc.
- News releases. Writing and
distributing a news release is a
cost-effective means of
informing the public about the
results and accomplishments of
your program. Develop a
mailing list of newspapers, radio
and television stations, and
organizations that solicit articles
for publication. Send the news
release to volunteers and others
who are interested in publicizing
the monitoring program.
The first page of your news
release should feature the
sponsoring organization's name
and logo to clearly designate the
source of the news. Include a
headline, the date, a contact name and number, and
whether the story is for release
immediately or a later date. The
first paragraph should begin
with a dateline (the city of origin
for the event or story described
in the release) and include the
essentials: who, what, where,
when, and why and a synopsis
of the most important elements
of the story. The second
paragraph should contain the
second most important facts,
the third paragraph the third
most important points and so
on. Editors tend to chop off the
last paragraphs if short on
space. Therefore, be sure to
state your major points early in
the press release.
- News conferences. If your
report contains some real news,
or if it has led to a significant
event, (e.g., the mayor or city
council has recognized the value
of the report and issued a
statement of support) hold a
news conference. Timing and
location are important. Early in
the day, but after 10 a.m. is
good (most camera crews start
their workday at 9 a.m.)
because it allows plenty of time
to edit the tape before the noon
news broadcast. You may want
to consider timing the
conference so that a TV station
could broadcast it live at the
noon or the evening news
show. For the conference,
choose a place that has good
visuals, such as location along
the river or water body that you
have been studying, at your
headquarters where volunteers
can be shown working in the
background or at a recognition
gathering for volunteers.
- Other publicity. Be creative
in getting your report and
message out. Try writing op-ed
articles for local or statewide
papers, writing letters to the
editor, producing radio feeds (a recording of the group's leader
played over the phone to a
radio station), issuing media
advisories, and even advertising
in publications. For more help
on getting your message across,
consult the references cited
below.
References and Further Reading
Byrnes, J. 1994. How Citizen
Monitoring Data Became a Part
of Community Life. Volunteer
Monitor. 6(1):17.
Ely, E. 1992. (ed.) Monitoring
for Advocacy. Volunteer
Monitor. 4(1) Spring 1992.
Ely, E. 1992. (ed.) Building
Credibility. Volunteer Monitor.
4(2) Fall 1992.
Ely, E. 1994. Putting Data to
Use. Volunteer Monitor.
6(1):11.
Ely, E. 1995. (ed.) Managing
and Presenting Your Data.
Volunteer Monitor. 7(1)
Spring 1995.
Sweeney, K. 1989. The Media
Director: Patagonia's Guide
for Environmental Groups,
Ventura, CA.
Tufte, E.R. 1991. The Visual
Display of Quantitative
Information, Graphics Press,
Cheshire, Connecticut.
< Previous · Table of Contents · Next >
Office of Wetlands, Oceans & Watersheds Home
Watershed Protection Home | Monitoring Water Quality Home
EPA Home |
Office of Water |
Search |
Comments