Supplement to
Measuring the Metabolism
of Small Organisms
"With
two stoppered test tubes, a capillary tube and a drop of oil you can count
the oxygen molecules respired by any small cold-blooded creature. Here's
how to watch a beetle breath, and measure the metabolism of many other
fascinating forms of life."
by Shawn Carlson
This monograph provides supplemental information to "Measuring
the Metabolism of Small Organisms" published in "The Amateur Scientist"
Column of Scientific American magazine (December, 1995). You will
need to read the Scientific American article before delving into
this.
Warburg Apparatus
"The
Amateur Scientist" article explained how to construct a simple device
using two test tubes and a capillary tube to estimate the number of oxygen
molecules consumed and the number of carbon dioxide molecules produced
when a beetle breaths. Here's some important additional information that
will help you conduct these experiments.
What Fluids Can You Use in the Capillary Tube?
There are two criteria that determine which liquids can be used for the
plug. First, the fluid plug must not evaporate. Second, the plug should
have as low a viscosity as possible. That way it will slide easily against
the glass with little energy being lost to friction.
Lubricating oils work best. Vegetable oil and motor oil work well. General
lubricants work well also. Try WD-40. You could also try liquid soap.
How To Center The Droplet In The Capillary Tube
First, thread the capillary tube through the rubber stoppers. Then dip
the capillary tube into the fluid. Suck the fluid about 1/4 of the way
up the tube. Place a test tube over the end you just dipped and gently
grasp the test tube allowing heat from your hand to warm the air. As the
air warms, it expands and will push the fluid up into the capillary tube.
Completely coat the inside of the capillary tube by letting the fluid
run all the way to the other side of the capillary tube. By adjusting
your grip on the test tube you can control how fast the plug moves. When
it reaches the end, grip it very lightly so the plug moves very slowly.
You want the plug to be just a few millimeters across so drive most of
the fluid out through the end, while dabbing the end with a paper towel
to catch it. When you've got about 5 millimeters of fluid left in the
capillary tube, remove your hand and plunge the test tube into a room
temperature water bath. Gently place a test tube over the other stopper.
Warm this with your hand and the plug will move away from this end. When
the plug is positioned in the center of the capillary tube remove the
test tubes.
Move the plug slowly. If you try to position it too fast it will splinter
into a number of fragments and you'll have to start all over again.
It's a bit tricky to get this right so you'll have to practice. Because
of thermal inertia, the plug will move a bit even after you take your
hand off the test tube and so you'll have to learn how to anticipate its
motions. It took me about an hour to get the hang of it so don't get discouraged.
Tips-- Things to Do
- Keep
lots of spare capillary tubes around. No matter how careful you are,
you are going to break them.
- Try a
number of different diameters of capillary tubes. Experiment. Different
tubes will be suited for different conditions. It will take some practical
hands-on experience to select the best tube size for your application.
- Shore
up the inside of the plastic cup with a wooden disk that fits just below
the capillary tube. Paint the disk black or cover it with felt. When
you plunge the plastic cup into the water bath the water pressure will
distort the cup a little and will place stress on the capillary tube.
The disk reduces this stress and helps protect it against breakage.
It also provides a dark background against which the plug can be clearly
seen. (I made this modification after the article was in press, so this
tip does not appear there.)
- Place
both test tubes on the stoppers very carefully and at the same time.
When the test tube seals over the stopper, the pressure inside will
go up because the volume decreases slightly as the test tube is pushed
tight. That change in pressure can be enough to propel the plug right
out the other side. You can balance this by placing both test tubes
on slowly and at the same time. In fact, with a little practice, you
can do it without moving the plug at all.
- To remove
a test tube from the stopper, pinch the stopper firmly to hold it place
and gently twist the test tube as you pull it off. By holding the stopper
with your fingers you are reducing the stress felt by the capillary
tube.
- Tie a
small fish weight at the end of the test tubes to compensate for the
buoyant force experienced by the test tubes in the water bath. This
will also reduce the stress on the capillary tube.
The buoyant force is equal to the volume of the test tube in cubic meters
times the density of water in kilograms per cubic meter times g (the
acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 meters per square second). This force
acts at the center of the test tube and produces a torque that tries
to rotate the test tube upward and break the test tube off at the capillary
tube.
To compensate, calculate the mass of the water displaced. It's the density
of water (1 gram per cubic centimeter) times the number of cubic centimeters
of the test tube. Find two fish weights that are about half this weight
and attach each to a loop of thread. When you're lowering the test tubes
into the water bath, hook the weights over the ends of the test tubes.
Since these weights are about twice as far away from the cup, they only
need to be half as heavy as the buoyant force to cancel it.
Limitations
The Warburg device can be used to study insect respiration, but the technique
is limited.
You might think that a small capillary tube and small test tube give the
best response because a small change in pressure can be most easily seen.
You do want the smallest test tubes you can use, but the smaller the capillary
tube is, the larger the friction/mass ratios will be in the plug. This
friction will prevent the plug from reaching its true equilibrium position.
I've conducted trials where the plug remained frozen for several minutes,
and then, when the pressure difference built up sufficiently, it suddenly
broke loose and blew out all the way through the capillary tube. Even
if friction wasn't a problem, for some large insects the plug moves too
fast for you to be able to conduct an accurate trial. The point is, you'll
have to experiment to find the optimum capillary tube size to go along
with your test tube size, choice of oil, physical conditions (like temperature)
and the organism you're studying.
Although the friction in the tube is the biggest problem, the technique
is also limited by one's ability to measure the distance the droplet travels,
and control the time of each trial. It's quite an experimental challenge
to control all these factors and get a respiratory quotient that's accurate
to within 20 percent. I suspect that 10 percent is about as good as one
can do with this method.
Remember, error analysis is very important for any experiment. Every quantity
you measure has an associated error. You'll need to know how to handle
these errors to pull meaningful results from your data. Make sure you
have a good book on the topic by your side when you're struggling to understand
what all this means. Get a good book on statistics-- Data Reduction and
Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences by Philip R. Bevington, or Statistical
Treatment of Experimental Data by Hugh D. Young will get you started.
I also strongly recommend The Art of Science, by Joseph J. Carr (ISBN
1-878707-05-1) as an outstanding hands-on introduction to doing science,
including simple data analysis. This is probably the best book for you
to start with.
Electronic Pressure
Sensor
Far more
accurate and easy to build is a sensor with an electronic differential
pressure transducer. The transducer senses tiny pressure differences between
two test tubes and converts it into a voltage that is easily measured
with a voltmeter. These sensors aren't too expensive. I picked mine up
from Honeywell for just over $100 (#163PC01D36).
Keep in mind that the atmospheric pressure is approximately the equivalent
of 32 feet of water. The pressure sensor's highest setting (output about
5 volts) is about five inches of water or just 1.3 percent of atmospheric
pressure. A voltmeter can resolve a signal to within one millivolt and
the pressure sensor is stable (that is, it's output voltage does not drift
more than one millivolt.) That means that there are 5,000 different possible
pressures that this device can distinguish between 0 and 0.013 atmospheres.
So this device is sensitive to changes in pressure as small as three millionths
of one atmosphere! That's an incredibly sensitive device, and it's only
$100. (Honeywell recently told me that they are coming out with a new
device all integrated on a single chip that will sell for about $40.)
It registers pressure differences as small as 0.0003 percent of one atmosphere.
(For more information about this sensor, call Honeywell at (800) 537-6945.)
With this device, and a little care, you can take data that's good enough
to be published in a professional science journal.
The input ports on the sensor are two small protruding cylinders. They
are designed to fit inside standard 1/8th inch tubing. They are long enough
to support the stoppers, test tubes, NaOH and insects, and they are separated
enough so that the test tubes won't touch each other.
Using an electric hand drill, drill an undersized hole through the rubber
stoppers. You want the stoppers to fit tightly about the ports. To insure
an air-tight seal, put a dollop of aquarium cement to coat the cylinders
before you slip over the stoppers.
As pointed out in "The Amateur Scientist" article, you'll need to calibrate
this device. The simplest way to do that is to use a U-shaped manometer.
The article has a good picture of one. Plot the voltage out vs. height
difference. The result should be a straight line. Then, whenever you measure
a voltage, you'll instantly know the pressure difference.
The power supply described in "The Amateur Scientist" article is the simplest
one that will work. The power supply diagrammed there consists of a 12
AC to DC power adapter. The output is regulated at 12 volts with a 7812
integrated circuit chip. The 7812 chip is extremely common; you can pick
one up at any Radio Shack for about a dollar. Most 12 volt adapters provide
an unregulated voltage at a slightly higher voltage than specified on
the case. That's because the designers anticipate that whatever device
they are plugged into will have regulated the power at the specified voltage.
For example, most 12 AD to DC adapters in fact provide about 13 volts
out. The regulator chip then sets this to a stable 12 volts.
Using the power supply diagrammed in the article, the output will drift
by about 10 millivolts. While this drift will not affect your experiments
with a single large insect, it will limit your ability to measure the
metabolism of small ones. So if you want to do delicate measurements on
tiny insects, you'll need to improve on the power supply's performance.
You'll need three capacitors; a 4800 microfarad, 0.1 microfarad, and 10
microfarad. Mount the 4800 capacitor first at the far left end of a circuit
board. Make sure the positive end is connected to the positive terminal
of the 12 volt adapter and the negative side is connected to the other
(ground) terminal. Mount the 0.1 microfarad capacitor at least two inches
to the right from the larger capacitor. Next, mount the 7812 chip just
to the right of the small capacitor as close as you can easily do it.
Finally, mount the 10 microfarad capacitor just to the right of the chip.
Each element is connected directly to the next in a line; so the large
capacitor is connected between the adapter and the small capacitor; the
small capacitor leads to the 7812 chip; the chip leads to the 10 microfarad
capacitor. The terminals from the 10 microfarad capacitor lead to the
pressure sensor. The addition of these capacitors will stabilize the power
supply and permit you to make more detailed measurements.
You'll have to hook the power and signal leads up to three tiny wires
that protrude from the back of the sensor. I decided to poke the wires
through a circuit board and then solder three solid copper wires to them
and then feed the power and signals through these wires. Using a hot soldering
iron and being careful to minimize the contact time between the iron and
the wires, I was able to connect the wires without damaging the sensor.
Be very careful! Let the device cool completely before going on to the
next wire. At $110, you don't want to damage the sensor. Once the wires
are attached you can connect the power and signal wires however you wish.
Clip your digital voltmeter to the ground and output leads.
Next, prepare the test tubes and slip them over the stoppers. Submerge
the test tubes in a glass of water to keep them at the same temperature.
Now you're ready to take data.
Collecting the Insects
You'll want
to test this device with the largest beetle you can find. Hunting around
your garden or in a park isn't necessarily the most efficient way to find
them. It's best if you set several insect traps and let them come to you.
The simplest trap I know is to dig a hole deep enough to hold a mayonnaise
jar. Push the dirt around the jar so that it comes just up the rim. The
jar's mouth should be just a little lower than the surrounding dirt. By
doing this you've created a pit that's lined with a glass jar. You'll
want to place a shelter over the jar's mouth to shield the inside of the
jar from the sun. Otherwise your quarry could succumb to heat exhaustion
before you can collect it. I usually stake out a piece of cardboard like
a lean-to tent to protect the jar. You can come up with your own method
if you wish.
Place something inside that beetles like to eat. Old vegetables work well
on some species. Avoid potatoes. They produce a powerful nerve toxin when
damaged (as when they begin to rot) and this will injure or kill many
species of insects. Cut everything up and wet it with water. You can also
use raw or cooked meets. Remember, what you get will depend on what you
bait the trap with. You'll have to leave the food out until it begins
to spoil. Keep the bait moist so the bacteria can really go to town. That
stench of decay, unpleasant to us, rings the dinner bell for insects.
They will approach the jar, fall in, and will be unable to get back out.
You can keep things fairly sanitary by placing the bait inside a smaller
jar or beaker and placing this in the center of your trap. The insects
will be attracted by the smell, but will be unable to actually reach the
bait. You'll then be able to extract them without touching the bait.
Check your trap three times a day. It's especially important to check
it early in the morning so you can rescue the night critters that may
be more sensitive to sunlight and heat before they are affected by midday
conditions.
Taking the Data
Once you
begin your trials, you may be astonished at how quickly the readings on
the voltmeter change. It's best to take data in a three-person team, with
one person calling out the time, one calling out the data and the third
recording the numbers. The time keeper watches a the second hand on a
watch and calls out "time" every 10 seconds. The data reader then calls
out the number on the voltmeter and the recorder records it. This one-person
one-task scheme works quite well for long stretches of data taking.
It is vital that the data reader be scrupulously honest as to what the
number is. It's human nature to try and anticipate what the next number
will be once one starts to get a feel for how the numbers change. It's
possible that the anticipated number will appear on the screen between
when the recorder says "time" and the reader reads the number. It's vital
that the reader read the actual number when the recorder called "time".
Guessing the correct number makes people feel good about themselves and
so there is a strong psychological incentive to cheat just a bit and call
out the expected number. (Oddly, this is true even when no one else knows
that the reader is doing this mental guessing game.) This could skew the
results! Remember, be scrupulously honest even if it means proving yourself
wrong.
I strongly recommend that the recorder type the numbers straight into
a spread-sheet program on a computer. This will make it easy to graph
the data (assuming you have a program that graphs data) and see just how
the insect is reacting over time. Believe me, you don't want to have to
re-enter all this data. It's laborious, time consuming, and prone to entry
errors.
You will want to record the data in two columns; a time column on the
left and a voltage column just to the right of it. Since the data is taken
every ten seconds, the data recorder need not record the time for each
voltage reading. The time keeper should say "minute," followed by the
number at the start of each minute. For example, "minute 37" for the start
of the 37th minute past the hour. The recorder can then mark this position
by typing "37" in the time column and then tabbing over to the data column
and recording the voltage number called out by the reader. After the trial
is over, it's a simple matter to go back and fill in the seconds. Most
spread sheets have an option that will let you generate a sequence of
numbers down a column. Once you've verified that you have no gaps in your
data, you can use this feature to quickly fill in the time column.
If you only have two people in your team, then the data reader can double
as time keeper. If you're all by yourself, you can still do it, but you
will need to be very dedicated and very careful. It's very taxing to do
all three jobs by yourself. You barely have enough time, and so, you'll
be putting out 100 percent effort through out the entire trial. You can
do it, but I strongly recommend you getting at least one other person
to assist.
No matter what, every member of the data-taking team will have to be dedicated.
If you're measuring the metabolism of a beetle, you'll need to take data
without interruption for at least 45 minutes! It's very difficult to stay
focused for that amount of time so be sure you're ready. Every member
of the team should have a glass of juice near them with a drinking straw,
and take a bathroom break before you start. And make sure everyone in
your house knows what you're doing and agrees not to disturb you throughout
the experiment. You can't stop and you won't be able to answer questions
like "where are my house keys" without loosing valuable data. So be sure
you will be absolutely undisturbed.
Note, if you should loose some data for some reason, DO NOT STOP THE TRIAL!
A few missed points here and there won't destroy the value of your work.
Make sure to record the time at which you resume taking data. So don't
get upset if something happens to interrupt the flow of data. Just recover
as best you can and keep going.
The best way to take data is to let your PC handle it. Then data taking
won't take much of your time. You can set up the trial, come back 45 minutes
later and start a new trial. Indeed, with an electronic pressure sensor
and a computer taking your data, it will be much easier for you to make
original contributions to knowledge. And a computer interface will be
useful for virtually every experiment you will ever do! Believe me, one
can change your life!
You'll need some software and hardware that allow you to interface the
sensor with your computer. There are some inexpensive ways to do it, but
they require some sophisticated knowledge of electronics, and are beyond
the scope of this monograph. Commercial packages are available, but they
tend to be pretty expensive-- costing $1,000 or more. My personal favorite
is LabView because there is absolutely nothing it can't do, but it is
expensive and can be tricky to use for the uninitiated. I intend to write
an article about computer interfaces for "The Amateur Scientist," but
it won't appear for a number of months.
General Don'ts
Here are
a few things to look out for while conducting your trials:
Hypoxia. The organism's metabolism depends on the amount of oxygen
available. If the oxygen content drops by more than 2 percent the organism
may be affected. Oxygen makes up about 21 percent of the atmosphere, so
don't let the pressure drop by more than about 0.4 percent during your
trials.
Exposure to NaOH. While not too caustic, NaOH
is caustic enough to warrant care in how you use it. A drop on your clothes
will burn through in a day, and any in your eyes will cause you extreme
pain and could send you to the hospital. So whenever using the NaOH make
sure to use the proper caution. Wear old clothes (preferably a lab coat
if you have one), rubber gloves, and a pair a safety goggles. Should you
get any in your eyes, flush with water and call a medical hot-line for
advice.
Don't expose your test specimens to NaOH either. You must be certain
that your test subject can not possibly come in contact with the NaOH.
I pack the NaOH very loosely into the bottom of the test tube and place
a small dab of paper towel just at the base. The NaOH absorbs moisture
from the air and dissolves somewhat. The paper towel is insurance that
this material won't leak up into the rest of the test tube. Next, I place
in a couple of layers of plastic wire mesh. They isolate the insect and
yet allow air to pass to the NaOH freely. Avoid using a large piece of
cotton wadding or anything else that might interfere with carbon dioxide
molecules that leave the organism from reaching the NaOH.
Suggested Experiments
Here are
some ideas for experiments you can do:
Stability of the Respiratory Quotient
Measure the respiratory quotient for a single beetle 30 times. Produce
a histogram. Now, measure the respiratory quotient of 30 different beetles
and plot a histogram of the result. How do these histograms compare? You'll
need to use a statistical test to see if they are really different. Looking
at it by eye won't do. You'll want to use the Student's T Test to see
if the curves are gaussian ("bell-shaped"). Then see if their means and
standard deviations are similar.
Respiratory Quotient Over Time
Does the respiratory quotient change over a beetle's life? To test this
you'll want to raise a colony of beetles and track their respiratory quotients
over their life time. You can measure the respiratory quotient of all
the beetles together to get an average of the colony. What kind of variations
do you find? Do you find any evidence of a biological clock that regulates
the respiratory quotient?
Respiratory Quotients of Different Species
Compare the respiratory quotients of a number of different species of
beetles taken under similar conditions. Can you find general trends in
the data? Do large beetles have larger or smaller respiratory quotients
than small beetles for instance?
Respiratory Quotient Vs Oxygen Content
Monitor the respiratory quotient of a beetle keeping NaOH in the test
tube to absorb the carbon dioxide. Measure the respiratory quotient as
the oxygen level drops. What changes do you see?
Respiratory Quotient Vs Time Of Anesthetized Beetles
Drop a little dry ice into a flask with water. The misty white gas that
comes off is carbon dioxide. Direct this into the container holding the
insects and flood out all the regular air. Measure how the respiratory
quotient and oxygen consumption returns to normal after the insects are
removed from the container. Run the trials for different exposure times.
Also, measure the oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production separately.
How is the recovery time related to exposure time? To temperature? To
the insects' size? Do repeated exposures affect the insects' recovery
time? Try exposing the insect to other agents. You might experiment with
a non-lethal dose of an insect poison.
Oxygen Consumption Vs Temperature
If you place a fish aquarium heater in the water bath and record the temperature
with an accurate thermometer you can do all sorts of explorations into
how the organism's metabolism is affected as it's temperature rises. Alternatively,
by slowly cooling the water--adding a few fragments of ice every so often
to the water bath, you can observe the metabolism as the temperature falls.
It's easiest to control the temperature if you insulate the water bath.
So, if you're using the electronic pressure sensor, perform your experiment
inside three nested Styrofoam cups.
How is the respiratory quotient dependent on the insect's diet?
See if your insects can be coerced into changing their diets. Try to get
them to eat a diet of pure sugar. Does their metabolism change? If you
can't induce them to change their diets, try starving them. Does the respiratory
quotient change over time? If so, you will be able to see how the insect
draws on different energy stores in its body as a response to starvation.
By monitoring the oxygen consumed you'll be able to see how it adjusts
it's rate of energy consumption when stressed in this manner.
Other Interesting Organisms
Remember, don't limit yourself to insects. You can use this apparatus
to measure the metabolism of any small oxygen consuming organism. Seeds,
Molds and Fungus are very interesting kinds of life! We urge you to explore
their properties as well.
Whatever experiments you do, please be very careful to be systematic and
thorough. Keep a detailed lab book that describes exactly what you did
and what you found. When it comes to experimental science, you should
always live by the maxim "If it isn't in the log book, it didn't happen."
Organize your lab book so that a knowledgeable stranger could read it
and understand exactly what you did. Highlight your results.
Please let us know what you find! We'll share the information with insect
experts who will advise you about how to develop your work to make original
contributions to knowledge. While these experiments are fun, they can
also benefit humanity if you are willing to share your results with others.
Sharing your discoveries, no matter how obscure they may seem, is a wonderful
way to contribute to the betterment of the world..
|